Life after ASP - Saving cost

You can see what worked, and what didn't work at all.

Quietly this operator is removing the requirement to inject polymer from her flood. This ASP flood was approved six years ago. Now the operator will just inject water. Is this a cost saving initiative? Is it abandoning a failed flood? Did the operator get tired of the operational problems that go with an ASP flood? Reading applications can help you find out. We found this using AppIntel.

Since each application is ground-truthed to a UWI, you can look at this application and compare it with historical production. You can see what worked, and what didn't work at all. You can review the injection patterns established from an application. You can compare actual production to the plan proposed to the regulator.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help. Click the button below to get these application documents within moments.

Tags: Polymer, Flood, Cut costs

  11 May 2016

Alberta operators losing $13 billion per year from unoptimized floods

How much are you losing?

Evaluating acquisitions

The rest of the story

Disposal or injector

It’s more than just a name

Industry environmental disputes come from new paradigms

How to resolve opposing agendas