Regulator holds up CSS on max operation pressure concerns
Regulator wanted detail of MOP strategy and risk wells.
The AER is holding up this CSS application because it wants more detail on maximum operating pressure strategy and because the applicant didn't address enough risk wells. The regulator is also seeking more detail on seismic interpretation of cap rock integrity.
Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, commercial schemes, experimental schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.
Subscribers can view this application by pasting the following link into their browser after logging into AppIntel. http://app.appintel.info/AOW.php?pxnrg=7x616y313o3831383138343473
Tags: Thermal
Granger Low 25 May 2015

Did caprock really fail?
Managing steaming risk in thermal schemes

10 ways to prevent steam flow to surface risk
And definitively prove it

Safely steaming
Assessing geological and wellbore risk

Newest CSS limestone paradigm
Oil and gas avoids jagged AI intelligence




Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share