Regulator holds up CSS on max operation pressure concerns

Regulator wanted detail of MOP strategy and risk wells.

Stress as a function of depth chart The AER is holding up this CSS application because it wants more detail on maximum operating pressure strategy and because the applicant didn't address enough risk wells. The regulator is also seeking more detail on seismic interpretation of cap rock integrity.

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, commercial schemes, experimental schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.

Subscribers can view this application by pasting the following link into their browser after logging into AppIntel. http://app.appintel.info/AOW.php?pxnrg=7x616y313o3831383138343473

Tags: Thermal

Granger Low  25 May 2015



NCGI hits mainstream

Methane injection in every pad

AER's IAR is down

The OneStop application query is down.

Trust is currency.  Ignore it and everything costs more.

AppIntel AI shows how to really prevent SAGD steam breakthrough

Bug floods are in fashion

Adjusting nutrients to grow microbes faster

Did caprock really fail?

Managing steaming risk in thermal schemes

10 ways to prevent steam flow to surface risk

And definitively prove it

Safely steaming

Assessing geological and wellbore risk

Newest CSS limestone paradigm

Oil and gas avoids jagged AI intelligence

This page last updated 13 November 2026.
Copyright 2011-2026 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting intelligence from industry submissions vetted by government. Nothing on this page may be construed as engineering or geoscience advice. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share