Mitigating flow to surface risk

Managing MOP by area

pressure gaugeSoon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.

The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

  Get details of this cool tech   Subscribers get them for free

Tags: Thermal, Compliance

Granger Low  20 Apr 2016



Evaluating acquisitions

The rest of the story

Disposal or injector

It’s more than just a name

Sulphur plant turndown

See his process flow diagrams

Saving SAGD OTSG from caustic failure

On the path to increasing water recycle rate

Every drop counts

Saving water while fracking

Save the world by recycling drilling fluids

Reuse as polymer hydrating solution

Alberta operators losing $13 billion per year from unoptimized floods

How much are you losing?

This page last updated 15 May 2026.
Copyright 2011-2026 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting intelligence from industry submissions vetted by government. Nothing on this page may be construed as engineering or geoscience advice. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share